Discuss your workflow

Purpose-built software for financial and advisory firms

Software built around the way your firm works.

We build and manage private software for boutique banks, private equity firms, and advisory teams whose work runs through complex files. It fits the folders, rules, and review process your team already knows.

From the first working version through the changes that follow.

Company A / Deal materials
Company_A_CIM.pdfFY2025 · Selected source01
Company_A_CIM_v2.pdfSame period, unconfirmed version?
Company_A_QoE.pdfFY2025 · Adjusted earnings03
Operating_model.xlsxFinancials worksheet04
CIM · p. 24 → Financials!F12
Deal review workbookFY2025 · USD m
Financials!F12FY2025 · USD millions · Source attached

One discrepancy held for reviewAdjusted earnings need the team’s judgment.

Illustrative workflow · Sample dataSources remain attached to the output

Built around
specialist work

  • Boutique & middle-market investment banks
  • Independent private equity
  • Valuation & transaction advisory
  • Specialist professional services

Inside the workflow

There is a lot of context
inside a client folder.

A figure becomes useful once you know which entity, period, and version it refers to. We build those checks into the workflow, alongside the output and review process your team needs.

Find documents across years of engagement folders, with the original location and uncertain versions in view.

Explore this workflow
Document registerCompany A · FY2025
Find in approved folders
Engagements / Company A
02_Financials
Company_A_CIM.pdf
FY2025_statements.pdf
Received / Sept
Company_A_CIM_v2.pdf
Operating_model.xlsx
Archive / FY2024
Company_A_CIM_2024.pdf
2 relevant sources
Company_A_CIM.pdf
Source selected
Version unconfirmed

CIM_v2 identifies the same year. Its name alone does not establish which version to use.

Inspect original-file references

Illustrative paths. Authoritative files stay in place.

/Engagements/Company_A/02_Financials/Company_A_CIM.pdf

/Engagements/Company_A/Received/Sept/Company_A_CIM_v2.pdf

/Engagements/Company_A/02_Financials/FY2025_statements.pdf

Original files stay in placeAccess boundaries agreed with your team
Illustrative workflow · Sample data · An index of original sources

Bring the figures into your deal template and keep the supporting pages close enough to check.

Explore this workflow
Company ADeal workbook

Your deal review template

FY2025 · USD millions · Draft for team review

CIM, page 24Revenue · 84.2
Your templateFinancials!F12
Company A, FY2025, USD millions. Illustrative workbook pending review.
Requested fieldFY2025Source
Revenue84.2CIM · p. 24
Reported EBITDA12.6CIM · p. 25
Adjusted EBITDAReviewQoE · p. 18

Adjusted EBITDA is held for reviewConflicting adjustment totals. No value accepted.

Each mapped field keeps its reporting period, units, and source reference in the workbook.

Selected sources, with locations

Company A · FY2025 · USD millions

Revenue · 84.2
Company_A_CIM.pdf · p. 24
Reported EBITDA · 12.6
Company_A_CIM.pdf · p. 25
Adjusted EBITDA · 14.1 / 13.8
Company_A_QoE.pdf · p. 18
Operating_model.xlsx · Financials!F18

CIM_v2 remains unconfirmed in the document register. It does not silently replace the selected source.

Confirm the adjustment bridge

Exception 01 · Adjusted EBITDA · FY2025 · USD millions

Reported EBITDAAdjustments to confirm
QoE14.1
Model13.8

12.6 reported + 1.5 / 1.2 in adjustments. The bridge needs confirmation.

QoE · p. 1814.1
Model · Financials!F1813.8

QoE reports adjusted EBITDA of 14.1; the operating model shows 13.8. Confirm the adjustment bridge before using either figure.

Awaiting professional review. Neither figure is accepted into the workbook.

Illustrative workflow · Sample data · Select a tab to inspect

Compare company submissions in a consistent format while missing reports and unit differences stay visible.

Explore this workflow
Quarterly portfolio reportingRevenue · USD millions
What changed this quarter?
Q1 2026Q2 2026
Company A / Q2 2026

Revenue increased from 20.4 to 21.8 USD million. Both periods are attached for the reviewer to check.

Company_A_Q1_2026.pdf · p. 3 / Company_A_Q2_2026.pdf · p. 3
Inspect source references
  • Company_A_Q1_2026.pdf · p. 3 / Company_A_Q2_2026.pdf · p. 3. Revenue increased from 20.4 to 21.8 USD million. Both periods are attached for the reviewer to check.
  • Company_B_Q1_2026.xlsx · Summary!B8 / Company_B_Q2_2026.xlsx · Summary!B8. The Q2 submission reports 10,200 in USD thousands. The workbook uses USD millions, so conversion is held for confirmation.
  • Company_C_Q1_2026.pdf · p. 2 / Q2 source not received. The Q2 submission has not been received. The previous period remains visible; no new revenue figure is filled in.
Draft reporting outputProfessional sign-off required
Illustrative workflow · Sample data · Figures and unresolved submissions shown together

Connect the request list to the files received, so the team can see what is still outstanding.

Explore this workflow
Diligence request trackerCompany A · Proposed updates
Request 01 / Received

The file matches the requested year. A proposed “received” status records delivery; the team still reviews the substance.

Prepared for reviewNo external messages sent
Illustrative workflow · Sample data · Received does not mean diligence complete

Illustrative examples of systems we could scope with your team. Each engagement is purpose-built.

Purpose-built software. Managed end to end.

We stay with the software
as your work changes.

A useful system needs attention after launch. When a reporting template changes or a new document format arrives, we maintain and improve the agreed software with your team. The scope stays clear, and professional judgment stays with you.

01 / UnderstandMap the actual process

Files, review points, and the output your team needs.

02 / BuildValidate a working pilot

Representative documents, unusual cases, and agreed criteria.

03 / MaintainKeep the system useful

Integration, support, and improvements within the agreed scope.

An example after launch

The quarterly template is mapped to the company reports.

TemplateRevenue + EBITDA
Software mappingAgreed fields mapped
ReviewCheck sourced output
Illustrative maintenance change. Further work and release priorities are agreed with your team.
How we work together

Built into the engagement

You should be able to see
where an answer came from.

We define access, data handling, and review requirements with your team before implementation.

That means deciding which information the software may use, how results reach the team, and where a person needs to check them.

Agreed access boundaries

Define who can access which information and how it may be handled before implementation.

Results with sources

Design outputs so reviewers can trace a figure to its file, period, and source location.

Exceptions in view

Make missing information and conflicting figures visible at the point of review.

A useful handoff

Fit the output to the team’s templates and tools, with professional sign-off built into the process.

Let’s look at the work

What does your team
keep doing by hand?

Tell us where the files come from and what you need at the other end. We can work through what a useful first version would look like.

Discuss your workflow